Terence âBudâ Crawford, one of the most accomplished boxers of his generation and one of only three men in history to become an undisputed champion in two different weight classes during the four-belt era, has caused a stir by unveiling his list of the five greatest boxers of all time.
During an appearance on the âFor Meâ podcast hosted by Kamaru Usman and Henry Cejudo, Crawford revealed his selections: âFor me, youâve got Sugar Ray Robinson, Sugar Ray Leonard, Floyd Mayweather Jr., Marvin Hagler, and Roberto Duran.â This list, which highlights some of the most legendary names in boxing history, has sparked significant debate, particularly due to Aliâs absence.
The omission of Muhammad Ali, a globally revered figure in the sport, has raised eyebrows among fans and analysts alike. Crawford, whose own career is laden with groundbreaking achievements, has presented a personal and unique perspective on greatness in boxing.
Host Cejudo also expressed surprise at the omission of Manny Pacquiao, another boxer whose career has garnered widespread admiration. Crawford offered a candid explanation for his choices: âMannyâs a generational fighter, who is very talented. Like, he has accomplished what no other fighter is ever going to accomplish. But, I donât feel like he personally did it all on his own, thatâs my opinion.â

Manny Pacquiao celebrates his 12 round TKO victory against Miguel Cotto during their WBO welterweight title fight at the MGM Grand Garden Arena on November 14, 2009. (Al Bello/Getty Images)
Crawfordâs unique perspective on greatness
Terence Crawfordâs list reflects his personal view of what defines greatness in boxing. His decision to leave out Ali and Pacquiao underscores the subjective nature of such lists, as different boxers prioritize various aspects of the sport.

see also
Boxing legend Mike Tysonâs unexpected verdict on Gervonta Davis vs Lamont Roach fight controversy
The debate over defining âGreatnessâ in boxing
The controversy surrounding Crawfordâs list raises important questions about what constitutes greatness in boxing. Is it the accumulation of titles and records, as seen with Pacquiao? Or is it about dominance, technique, and style, as exemplified by Mayweather?
Crawfordâs own remarkable career, particularly his ability to unify titles across multiple weight classes, adds depth to the conversation. His choices, though contentious, reflect his personal understanding of the sport and his respect for its nuances, making his perspective a compelling part of the ongoing debate about the greatest boxers of all time.





